Search Results

Once the design of a door sheetmetal and accessories is confirmed, the acoustics of the door system depends on the sound package assembly. This essentially consists of a watershield which acts as a barrier and a porous material which acts as an absorber. The acoustical performance of the watershield and the reverberant sound build-up in the door cavity control the performance. This paper discusses the findings of a design study that was developed based on design of experiments (DOE) concepts to determine which parameters of the door sound package assembly are important to the door acoustics. The study was based on conducting a minimum number of tests on a five factor - two level design that covered over 16 different design configurations. In addition, other measurements were made that aided in developing a SEA model which is also compared with the findings of the results of the design study.

This paper discusses the contribution of instrument panel systems in a European side-impact event. Systems studied include a conventional steel cross-car beam system and a glass-mat thermoplastic (GMT) composite system, evaluated in a body-in-white structure. A thermoplastic composite instrument panel system offers mass, cost, and recycling benefits, but its performance vs. a conventional steel cross-car beam system merited an engineering investigation. The comparison methodology used included a nonlinear dynamic side impact study with a moving, deformable barrier developed according to European Economic Community (EEC) standards. A finite-element model used in this study simulated the body-in-white structure, barrier structure and instrument panel systems. The resulting data include velocity, displacement and energy absorption levels of various components of the respective instrument panel systems.

Four 1998 Mitsubishi Carismas, two equipped with direct injection (GDI) and two with port fuel injection engines (PFI) were tested in a designed experiment to determine the effect of mileage accumulation cycle, engine type, fuel and lubricant type on engine wear and engine oil performance parameters. Fuel types were represented by an unadditised base fuel meeting EEC year 2000 specifications and the same base fuel plus synthetic deposit control additive packages. Crankcase oils were represented by two types (1) a 5W-30 API SJ/ILSAC GF-2 type engine oil and (2) a 10W-40 API SH/CF ACEA A3/ B3-96 engine oil. The program showed that specific selection of oil additive chemistry may reduce formation of intake valve deposits in GDI cars.. In general, G-DI engines produced more soot and more pentane insolubles and were found to be more prone to what appears to be soot induced wear than PFI engines.